Archive for the ‘Student Issues’ Category
Posted by Kevin Bondelli on April 6, 2008
Posted by Kevin Bondelli on October 23, 2007
How well does your university score when it comes to LGBT equality?
You can read the press release here.
To date, nearly one hundred public and private four- year campuses are listed online, and nearly twice that have committed to an assessment in the near future. In development since 2001, the LGBT-Friendly Campus Climate Index was created in response to the increasing demand for tools and resources to support campuses in assessing LGBT-Friendly programs, policies and practices.
Every campus listed online has participated in a comprehensive self-assessment process based on more than 50 questions under eight different LGBT-friendly categories. Each institution participating in the voluntary program receives a confidential report with results and recommendations to improve the quality of campus life for LGBT & Ally people.
Campus Pride encourages all colleges and universities nationwide to be listed online. The index boasts a Premier Campus Spotlight as well as an Honor Roll that highlights campuses scoring a three-star rating or above. Each participating campus has a public profile available for viewing, and the My Bookbag feature allows visitors to choose an unlimited number of campus favorites to compare and request additional information.
Posted by Kevin Bondelli on July 29, 2007
Hey kids, good news! Student loans will become cheaper under a bill approved last week by the Senate. H.R. 2669, passed 78-17, will recast the Department of Education as Robin Hood, diverting money from lending companies to students.
Posted by Kevin Bondelli on July 27, 2007
College students returning to campus in a few weeks will be greeted by steep increases in one of the few items they have been able to buy cheap: birth control.
For years, drug companies sold birth-control pills and other contraceptives to university health services at a big discount. This has served as an entree to young consumers for the drug companies, and a profit center for the schools, which sell them to students at a moderate markup. Students pay perhaps $15 a month for contraceptives that otherwise can retail for $50 or more.
But colleges and universities say the drug companies have stopped offering the discounts, and are now charging the schools much more. The change has an unlikely origin: the Deficit Reduction Act signed by President Bush last year. The legislation aimed to pare $39 billion in spending on federal programs, from subsidized student loans to Medicaid. And among the changes was one that, through an arcane set of circumstances, created a disincentive for drug makers to offer school discounts.
The contraceptive prices offered to schools are now included in a complex calculation that determines certain Medicaid-related rebates that drug makers must pay to states. In this calculation, deep discount prices would have the effect of increasing drug makers’ payments.
Colleges and universities say the change is having a significant impact on their health centers and the students they serve. Prices have begun skyrocketing for many popular brands of birth control. Health centers are having to reconfigure their offerings and write new prescriptions. And college students are making some tough choices, such as switching to cheaper generic brands or forgoing their privacy in order to claim their pills on their parents’ insurance.
The changes actually took effect earlier this year, but when it became clear to college health providers that the economics were going to change, many of them stocked up on several months’ worth of supply. Only lately has that cheaper supply begun petering out. Some students started seeing the steeper prices last spring and some are dealing with it now during summer sessions, while others won’t see it until they return for the fall semester.
In recent months, at Michigan State University, East Lansing, the price of Ortho Evra, a birth-control skin patch by Johnson & Johnson, more than doubled to $50 for a month’s prescription from $20 last year. At the University of Iowa in Iowa City, Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo, a low-estrogen pill also by J&J, rose to $52 recently — from $16 last year. The University of Texas at Austin now charges more than $50 for Organon Inc.’s popular NuvaRing, a monthly vaginal device, from $12.
To save money, at the University of Iowa, about three-fourths of students on Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo — a pill that has no generic form — have switched to a less-expensive option.
Such changes concern health professionals, who fear that switching is going to lead to unintended pregnancies by women who are less likely to consistently take a daily pill. “One of the seminal concepts in contraceptive medicine is when a woman is using a method correctly and successfully, the last thing you want to do is change her from that,” says Lee Shulman, board chairman of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. “You don’t want to change her unless there is an absolute medical necessity to do so.”
He says even switching from one type of daily pill to another can pose new risks for side effects and discomfort, potentially leading women to stop taking it.
Susan Maly, a 22-year-old student at the University of Iowa, says she struggled with switching pills recently. When she went to her college health center to get a refill on her Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo prescription a few months ago, she was distressed to find out that it had gone up to $54 from about $18. Starting this month, she has switched to a cheaper generic pill that has higher levels of estrogen than the Lo brand.
“That was an issue for me,” says Ms. Maly, but she says she will see how things work out for a couple of months. Initially, she says she felt some heartburn side effects from the new pill, but that has since gone away. She finds the dramatic price increase “unfair” to women who have come to rely on birth control, and feel comfortable with the brand they are on.
“This is the one thing that many females on campus are getting from student health,” says Ms. Maly. “It felt like we were a target.”
At drug maker Organon, Nick Hart, executive director for contraception, says, “On the one hand, it’s a tremendous disservice to our customers, our young women.” But he says that providing low-cost access to young consumers has to be balanced with “our fiduciary responsibility. It puts us in an untenable position.”
A Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman said, “As a result of this new legislation,” only institutions that qualify as “safety net” providers under the law will get the company’s discounted prices. Safety-net providers include certain facilities that serve low-income families. She added, “We are one of the lowest-cost providers of contraceptives to public health services.”
Health professionals say it’s particularly critical for college women to have access to cheap contraception. Two-thirds of college students reported having at least one sexual partner in the prior 12 months, according to a fall 2006 survey of more than 23,000 students by the American College Health Association. Condoms have been available free on many campuses, and are considered the best form of contraception for preventing sexually transmitted infections.
“Maybe, if more people switch from hormonal methods to condoms, we may see a positive outcome of fewer STI’s,” says Mary Hoban, a project director for the American College Health Association. “But from a contraceptive standpoint, we may see more unintended pregnancy. It’s a double-edged sword.”
About 40% of sexually active college women reported relying on pills and other prescription forms of birth control, according to the ACHA data.
“College women are at the highest risk for unintended pregnancy because they’re sexually active, they’re very fertile, and they are away from home,” says Dr. Shulman, adding that students count on their health service for a host of reasons, from counseling to testing for sexually transmitted diseases, to birth-control prescriptions.
Many young women turn to their college health centers for these services because of the privacy it affords as much as the convenience and pricing. Theresa Spalding, medical director at UT Austin’s University Health Services, says that “now, at the higher price, they are faced with having to decide, ‘Do I involve my parents?'” in order to get insurance coverage.
College health centers also say the change threatens to lessen the quality of service they can provide, since the price increases have eaten into the profits that they make. Pamela Houle, administrative director for the health center at Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, N.Y., says the health center now subsidizes each NuvaRing by about $4. “Previously, we were making $17 a ring.” That may mean fewer educational resources and materials down the line, she says.
Posted by Kevin Bondelli on July 26, 2007
When I graduated from college in 1977, the average cost for a year’s tuition, room, and board at a public, four-year school was $1,936. That was a major expense: almost 15% of the average American household’s income, enough to make many families think twice before sending their children to college.
Since then, the price tag has grown much, much higher. It is now a dizzying $13,000, almost 28% of the average household’s annual earnings. Instead of graduating with hope for their future, today’s college students graduate with loan payments as far as the eye can see.
Earlier this month, Congress acted to rein in the runaway cost of higher education. With my enthusiastic support, the House of Representatives passed the College Cost Reduction Act, which will help millions of American students afford a college degree.
The bill expands eligibility for Pell Grants, dramatically reduces the interest rates on federal student loans, and helps public servants such as firefighters and first responders pay off their college loans. Best of all, it won’t cost American taxpayers a single new penny. By eliminating excessive subsidies to the student loan industry, the legislation pays for itself.
Here in Kansas, we have always believed that everyone who works hard should have the chance to succeed. We believe that college should open doors, not close them. Education should create opportunities, not debt.
The College Cost Reduction Act brings that vision one step closer to reality.
With warm regards,
Member of Congress